You might not know that the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), introduced in the late 1980s, was originally made to standardize emissions and fuel economy testing across Europe.
While it aimed to create a uniform standard, the NEDC has been heavily criticized for not accurately reflecting real-world driving conditions.
This gap has led to overly optimistic fuel economy numbers and not enough emissions reductions, especially for diesel vehicles.
So, what exactly went wrong, and how has the industry responded to these issues?
Quick Navigation
Historical Context
The New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), created in the late 1980s, was designed to standardize emissions and fuel economy tests across Europe.
It included an Urban Driving Cycle (UDC) and an Extra-Urban Driving Cycle (EUDC) and moved from UNECE regulation 15 to 83, making the rules stricter.
However, as hybrid cars became more common, the NEDC didn’t accurately reflect real-world driving, so the WLTP was adopted instead.
How New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) Influences Car Parts and Systems
The New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) provides crucial benchmarks for assessing fuel efficiency and emissions, significantly benefiting various vehicle components.
Combined Fuel Economy is a primary beneficiary, as NEDC tests provide a standard for evaluating and improving overall fuel efficiency.
Engine configuration is optimized through NEDC evaluations, helping manufacturers fine-tune engines for better performance under regulated driving conditions.
Turbocharger performance is assessed and enhanced during NEDC tests, leading to improvements in power output while maintaining fuel efficiency.
Exhaust Manifold benefits from NEDC testing by ensuring that emissions are minimized, helping manufacturers meet regulatory standards.
Emission Standards are directly tied to NEDC results, as the cycle helps ensure vehicles adhere to strict guidelines for pollutant emissions.
Aerodynamic Drag is also a key factor tested during the NEDC, leading to improvements in vehicle design for greater efficiency.
Regenerative braking is optimized through the NEDC, particularly in hybrid and electric vehicles, enhancing energy recovery and efficiency.
Hybrid powertrain systems are evaluated using NEDC tests, allowing manufacturers to improve fuel economy and performance across different driving scenarios. These components rely on the NEDC for guidance in meeting regulatory and efficiency standards.
Testing Procedures
When performing the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) test, begin with a cold vehicle at temperatures between 20-30°C, making sure it has been sitting for 6 hours before starting.
The test includes:
- Urban Driving Cycle: Repeating the ECE-15 test four times.
- Extra-Urban Driving Cycle: Testing at higher speeds.
- Constant Volume Sampling: Measuring emissions.
- Maximum Speeds: 50 km/h for urban, 120 km/h for extra-urban.
- Total Duration: 1180 seconds.
Criticisms and Issues
Even though it’s widely used, the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) has been heavily criticized for not accurately reflecting real-world driving conditions.
The NEDC’s unrealistic acceleration and fixed speeds make fuel economy numbers look better than they really are, allowing for “cycle beating.”
Diesel vehicles show little improvement in reducing emissions, which hurts public health.
Because of these issues, the WLTP was created to provide more accurate test results and better mimic how people actually drive today.
Future Directions
Looking ahead to future testing methods, the car industry is set to use more accurate and realistic approaches.
Moving from the NEDC to the WLTP focuses on:
- Emissions by using real-world data
- Fuel consumption in different driving situations
- Including new vehicle technologies
- Better energy efficiency measures
- Tougher compliance with environmental rules
These changes ensure a thorough evaluation that meets new standards.
Do you know where to find the original NEDC Document?